|
Abstract:
|
Drainage is one of the basic facilities designed asa system to meet people's needs and is a key component of road and settlement planning. A more effective alternative method is needed to minimize execution time and worker needs. Thus, companies that supply products or services compete to look for alternatives to construction methods to build drainage lines.It will require a study of time length and the cost required of the two methods between the multiple stone couple channels and the precast u-ditch, in order to get the proper channel use of multiple stone couples and the precast u-ditch asa road support building in the karanganyar district district district. By means of a quantitative method, that is, a researcher's quest to discover knowledge by giving data in the form of Numbers.
The result is that the stone couple's channel run time during the 23 days that the precast u-ditch ditch run for 20 days the precast channel cost of idr 159,364,01367 with 215 m in length 'so permeable is idr 741,22797. The conduit for a pair of stones costs idr 112,087,996.35 with its measuring 157 m 'so permeable is idr 713,936.28. The calculation shows that the performance of a couple's channel often costs less than the one that has to do the precast u-ditch and the uditch couple couple times more quickly than does the stone coupling channel, although the new pair of stone couples channel often costs less than the one in the precast u-ditch channel, it turns out that 20 years of maintenance, A channel with a u-ditch precast is more feasible than the cost of a couple's channel times with a cost cost of idr 4.022.150,95 @ 1,2 meter. |